If you're having trouble accessing a Google product, there's a chance we're currently experiencing a temporary problem. You can check for outages and downtime on the Google Workspace Status Dashboard.
Well, the truth itself is the way things are, and like you're saying, there isn't so much we can do to further define that. It just is. But there's a second consideration, which is that humans make claims about the way things are. These claims may be considered as sequences of characters, or noises, or perhaps patterns of mental activity. And we call some of these claims true, and other claims ...
"There is no absolute truth because we as humans are restrained from ever knowing it" is fallacious, what humans can know imposes no restriction on what is. And "this" will only be a way out of the paradox after it specifies which axioms of classical logic are supposed to be dropped, and shows that what is left is enough and otherwise reasonable. There are several options described in standard ...
The difference in the philosophical world is that there is no one, universally acclaimed definition of either Truth or Reality for philosophers. Rather, the nature of these are foundational questions that help distinguish different philosophical positions and traditions. For Plato, for instance, Reality is a deeper level of existence underlying the perceptible world, and Truth is what brings ...
So, the short of it then is that truth about literal fiction is understood to be relevant to the context of the fiction, and sometimes when the truth of statements is questionable in regards to being a fiction (like instrumentalism), then it is seen as a tool, and therefore it is treated quasi-fictional.