Take your Rewards to the next level with a Triangle Credit Card! Collect Canadian Tire Money everywhere you shop, with no annual fee. Collect Canadian Tire Money even faster everywhere you shop, with no annual fee. Earn 4% back in CT Money on just about everything at your favourite stores *.
suffer from interference from other transmitters would be correct, corresponding to example 1.1; and ommitting the ‘from’ does not correspond to any of the examples there without ‘from’, and appears strange to me.
Is there a more colloquial synonym for "schadenfreude"? I'm specifically looking for a noun that denotes a pleasure derived from other people's misfortunes or sufferings. Sadly, I couldn't find any...
There was the following statement in Washington Post (July 29) article that came under the title, “ John Kelly, Trump’s new chief of staff, ‘won’t suffer idiots and fools.’” “Officials there had grown tired of the four-star general speaking off message - about the president’s plan to shut down the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, about the perceived vulnerability of America’s ...
Why is a just a rather odd wh -word. Its distribution is very limited -- it can only have the word reason as its antecedent, and since it's never the subject it's always deletable. Consequently it behaves strangely, as you and others point out.
In the sentence "Why is this here?", is "why" an adverb? What part of speech is "why?" I think it modifies the verb "is", so I think it is an adverb.
Why have a letter in a word when it’s silent in pronunciation, like the b in debt? Can anyone please clarify my uncertainty here?