Canadian Underwriter: Challenges in Fire Damage Assessment and Remediation: Forensic Engineering Perspectives
National Academies of Sciences%2c Engineering%2c and Medicine: Contaminants in the Subsurface: Source Zone Assessment and Remediation
iaea.org: Environmental Remediation - Social Multi-Criteria Analysis in Support of Decision-Making Processes in Environmental Remediation - part 1
Environmental Remediation - Social Multi-Criteria Analysis in Support of Decision-Making Processes in Environmental Remediation - part 1
Nature: Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE)
Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE)
The second edition of Webster's New International Dictionary was published in 1934, so it would appear that the pronunciation of processes with a "long e" sound in the last syllable has been around for some time. Note that processes seems to only be pronounced with /siz/ or /siːz/ when it is a plural noun.
I was just thinking about this when I typed out "processes" and realized that I've heard it pronounced both "process-izz" and "process-eez". Is one incorrect, or is it considered an accent thing, ...
0 This is a matter of context and semantics. Do you use a single process to perform all of your projects? Then the second is correct. Differing processes to perform each task would indicate that the first is correct.
In this document, we have defined several functions, processes, objects, states, properties, etc, and now I am wondering how and when to captialize the words, or rather when these things become proper names.
A question concerning capitalisation to calrify ambiguity as I've seen the words variously capitalized. Should the names of methods, processes or roles be capitalized? ( f. ex. Agile method, Sprint