GATE Computer Science Engineering Question Paper PDF: Every aspirant who is going to sit in the Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering (GATE) Computer Science Engineering (CSE) exam 2026 must practice ...
I'm dealing with a REST API and have this question, when a request is scheduled for further processing we should return 202, when a request has no response body we should return 204. What should we...
Getting handshake failed; returned -1, SSL error code 1, net_error -202 Error in Android Studio Ask Question Asked 1 year, 11 months ago Modified 1 year, 11 months ago
The main purpose of using 202 instead of 200 is for a server to communicate to a client: "From what I can tell, the request looks good. However, we haven't fully dealt with your request yet and we aren't 100% certain it's going to succeed". So if someone does a request, the server immediately responds and then forwards the request elsewhere, a 202 makes sense to me. If the request fails at the ...
HTTP Status code 202 vs 200 for a POST request - Stack Overflow
I think that your solution is fine, the Http status 202 is the proper response to use in this specific case indicating that the request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has not been completed. What I would slightly change in your workflow are the Http status of the subsequent requests. As you said, the 202 response should return a Location header specifying the URL that ...
Otherwise, a 202 "Accepted" status code is returned, and the client must poll the resource until the final representation is available. The reason for this behavior is the following: If a result is available within a few seconds, it needs to be retrieved as soon as possible; otherwise, when it becomes available is not important.